U.S. District Court
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS (HOUSTON)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE#: 4:18-cv-00594
Jaros vs. State of Texas et al. Filed 2/26/2018
Assigned to Judge Gray H. Miller Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Case in other court: County Court at Law 3, Montgomery, Texas, 14-00005-05366
Nature of Suit: 950 Constitutional – State Senate
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Petitioner: Joshua L. Jaros Represented By: Joshua L. Jaros
PRO SE
V.
Respondent: State of Texas
Respondent: Jessica M. Jaros
Respondent: Curtis M. Collum
Notice of Petition and Verified Petition for Warrant of Removal
Notice of Judicial Disqualifications
Notice of Constitutional Questions to Texas State Statutory Schemes
Memorandum of Law Clarifying Established Federal Jurisdiction
Notice of Special Pro Se Litigant Rights
Petitioner’s Certificate of Interested Persons and Entities
Notice of Constitutional Questions to Federal Statute 28 USC 1443
Notice of Pending Amendment of Petition Into Complaint
Order for Conference Deadline and Disclosure of Interested Parties
Order Referring Case to United State Magistrate Judge Nancy K. Johnson
Office of the Attorney General’s Motion for Remand
Notice Concerning Reference to United States Magistrate Judge
Office of the Attorney General’s Motion to Stay Scheduling Conference and Discovery
Order to File Response to Motion
Petitioner’s Response to Attorney General’s Motion to Remand
Reply Brief for the Office of the Attorney General’s Motion for Remand
Office of the Attorney General’s Response in Opposition to Petitioner’s Rule 59 Motion
- Order
- Order Denying Petitioner’s Motion for Reconsideration
- Order Denying Petitioner’s Rule 59 Motion
So glad this the corruption is coming to light
Sildenafil Sale viagra Cialis Fabrique En Inde
Cialis Ou Acheter Forum Cialis Daily Rezeptfrei cialis Achat Viagra Soft
Cialis Generique Vente En France Viagra Achat Pfizer Fluoxetine Next Day Overseas No Prior Script where to buy cialis online safely Cephalexin Double Vision Unterscheidung Levitra
What is the current status of this case? Was it actually removed from state court?